When
RE, head admin and creator of the Doomstead Diner, asked me to write
an article about the evils of Monsanto I was a bit confused by the
request at first. "Aren't we just preachin' to the choir"
I wanted to know. What am I going to write about that most people
don't already know? Most of what I know is from documentary films such as
Food Inc., a
Michael Pollan book or two (as well as many other books), the
occasional internet article, as well as the annual report generated
straight from Hell. Haven't heard of that report? It's called the
Earth Rape Newspeak Players Ball Report and it's discussed at the
annual Newspeak Players Ball. This is the real purpose of the
Bilderberger meeting every year. It's where the awards are handed
out by Satan himself. Monsanto has won four out of the last 10
awards with Satan praising their use of the word sustainability. He took the time to point out (at last years Earth Rape) how wonderfully
crafted and full of diverse and pure Newspeak Monsanto's "AboutUs" section of their website is:
At the heart of Monsanto is a very clear and principled code of conduct – one we expect all employees, contractors and management to live by every day. We operate under a genuine value system—our pledge—that demonstrates integrity, respect, ethical behavior, perspective and honesty as a foundation for everything we do.A key part of fulfilling the promise of our value system is by engaging our communities in a significant and positive manner. Not only do we work hard to support the family farmer in a variety of ways, but we also:
- provide extensive educational programs – particularly in science and agriculture – for students around the world
- fund numerous research grants for graduate students
- work in partnership with government bodies, non-profit agencies and advocacy groups to make agriculture more sustainable"
While
I'm at it, here's a video from Monsanto's website that might make you throw up a few times.
This
type of write up makes me very angry. Newspeak makes me angry in
general. But this is particularly pernicious Newspeak. Monsanto
making agriculture more sustainable? Is that why 16,196 Indian
farmers killed themselves in 2008, with over 15,000 suicides a year
from 2002 to 2008 according to Wiki.
These deaths are mainly due to Monsanto's BT cotton, but more
to the point it's due to Monsanto's "sustainable"
agriculture methods. Now, I study and practice permaculture methods,
which are actually sustainable agriculture methods. Monsanto
practices chemical mediated, genetically modified, monoculture.
Sustainability with plants depends mostly on diversity. That's why
in nature you don't see monocultures. You see thousands of different
species of plants growing in a true melting pot of diversity.
Monsanto's
agriculture is the opposite of sustainable. They move into a country
and get the farmers (whom practice sustainable agriculture passed on
through generations) to plant their GM seeds which will not grow
without Monsanto's application of poisonous chemicals. So now the
farmer is beholden to Monsanto to get their crops to grow. To add
insult to injury the seeds are what are known as "terminator
seeds" because subsequent generations of the plant are sterile
and will not produce the next years crop. So the farmer must buy
more seeds from Monsanto. By this time Monsanto has complete control
of the farmer (and their land) since the farmer cannot afford to
continue the charade without a hefty loan from the bank, which they
will never be able to repay since they will never see a profit. No
worries, cause Monsanto doesn't give two shits about the farmers and
their human needs. They've got huge machines that run by satellite
programming to do the job of the farmer. This is the real reason why
there has been an epidemic of Indian farmers committing suicide over
the last ten years. So I guess if farmers killing themselves,
genetically modified terminator seeds, and numerous application of
deadly poisons is sustainable than Monsanto has nailed it. So this
is the "variety of ways" that Monsanto "supports the
family farmer"? By making them debt slaves whom find it
practical to hang themselves?
There
are many evils associated with what Monsanto is doing, but to my
estimation, the most evil thing they have attempted to do is to
patent life itself. Percy Schmeiser, of Saskatchewan Canada, can
tell you all about that. His story is pretty well known, but in 1998
Monsanto sued him for growing their patented GM canola seed. Now, he
didn't grow their seeds, their seeds contaminated his 50 years of
work cultivating an heirloom canola variety. That happened because
nature has this amazing capacity to pollinate with pollinators. His
fields got contaminated with Monsanto's bull shit and then Monsanto
sued Schmeiser for growing their crop without permission (luckily
they did not succeed). I guess maybe next Monsanto will try to take the birds and the Bees to court for cross pollinating their patented
genetic modifications? What's with the birds and bees anyways? Don't
they know there is law to follow? Damn nature and it's anarchic form of resilient life.
As
far as genetically modifying natures design goes, this is what
Monsanto has to say about that completely risk free practice:
There is no need to test the safety of DNA introduced into GM crops. DNA (and resulting RNA) is present in almost all foods. DNA is non-toxic and the presence of DNA, in and of itself, presents no hazard.
Indeed, no need to test the effects of splicing non-plant DNA into
plants such as the "fish tomato" with it's winter flounder
anitfreeze transgene spliced into it for better frost protection.
Granted, this fish tomato was not brought to us by Monsanto, but
their logic applies here, and they were the first company to apply genetic modification to food crops. There is no need to test whether or not
this is a safe practice because "DNA is present in almost all
foods" and DNA is "non-toxic." Right, so sign me up
for a "fish tomato" sandwich with round up ready corn on
the cob. While I'm at it, why not some genetically modified soy
formula for my 3 month old with a BT Cotton onesie. Might as well get him ready for his diet
of mostly poisonous food so that he can get a head start on being sick for
the rest of his life. But hey, at least he won't be hungry while
he's dying from cancer.
The last thing we need is more chemicals on planet Earth. Monsanto
is in the business of making humanity even more dependent on
chemicals. A quick google search for "pollution in the womb" uncovered this gem:
Umbilical cord blood from 10 babies was tested for 413 industrial chemicals and pollutants. The tests found an average of 200 of these chemicals in each newborn, and a total of 287 chemicals in the group. The umbilical cord blood of the 10 babies harboured pesticides, consumer product ingredients, and wastes from burning coal, gasoline and garbage. Some of the chemicals found in the cord blood are banned or severely restricted in the US.Among the chemicals found were:
- eight perfluorochemicals used as stain and oil repellants in fast food packaging, clothes and textiles, including the Teflon chemical PFOA. PFOA was recently characterized as a likely human carcinogen.
- 21 organochloride pesticides.
- dozens of widely used brominated flame retardants (PBDEs) and their toxic by products, used in TVs, computers, foam and many other products. They are also found in some foods.Of the 287 chemicals detected in the study, 180 are known to cause cancer in humans or animals, 217 are toxic to the brain and nervous system, and 208 cause birth defects or abnormal development in animal tests.
I
wonder how many of those organochloride pesticides are brought to us
by Monsanto and their ilk? So we're going to Occupy Monsanto on
September 17th. Everywhere. Not sure what my part will be short of
writing this article. But maybe I'll put a sign up on the busy
roadside in front of my house that says something like "Monsanto
pollutes our wombs." Or "Monsanto causes cancer."
Anything to bring attention to the evil that is being perpetuated in
the name of profit by this ridiculous company and the food production philosophy they labor to cultivate. We don't need
genetically modified foods in moncultures. It is not a sustainable
practice. It is quite the opposite in fact. It causes more virulent
and pesticide resistant pests for our food crops. It causes slaves
to be made from simple farmers whom then kill themselves out of
desperation. It causes humanity to ultimately be at the mercy of
those who would seek to control all of our food for no other reason
than profit via patents on plant DNA.
The
question you have to ask yourself is do you want your food to be
cheap, nutritionally deficient, and destructive to sustainable
cultures throughout the world? Or do you want your food to be
nutritious and produced using natural methods that mimic natures
design while facilitating healthy human societies? We can do that as
a species if we decide to. There is a lot stopping us from
accomplishing the later goal, and Monsanto is behind a good bit of
that reasoning. There is no reason why we can't produce all of the
food we need as a species in a way that is regenerative, healthy, and
supportive of all life systems involved in the ecology of food
production. It's not a mystery. We know how to do it, and it does
not require the use of man made chemicals that pollute the wombs of
our unborn children, cause cancer, and convince simple farmers that
killing themselves is a better option than remaining Monsanto slaves.
We have the solutions. We can fix this mess. But we won't if you
don't pull your head out of the sand and start paying attention to
the evil's being perpetuated by corporations whom care about nothing
but profit. And at the expense of the health of our planet and all
of the species on it. We don't own the Earth, but we do share it with
billions of other life forms, a healthy majority of which we are
actively exterminating with the practices of our civilizations Big
Agriculture headed up by the likes of Monsanto.